Entrepreneurship πŸ“‘ Fast Company by Fast Company Β· Sat, Apr 4, 2026

A New York Times critic used AI to write a review, but good criticism can’t be outsourced

An author and freelance journalist has admitted to using AI to help him write a book review for The New York Times. Alex Preston’s review of Jean-Baptiste Andrea’s novel Watching Over Her, published by The New York Times in January 2026, draws phrases and full paragraphs from Christobel Kent’s review in The Guardian. The β€œerror” was brought to light by a reader, who alerted The New York Times to the similarities. Preston told The Guardian he is β€œhugely embarassed” and β€œmade a huge mistake.” The Times promptly dropped Preston, calling his β€œreliance on A.I. and his use of unattributed work by another writer” a β€œclear violation of the Times’s standards.” An editor’s note now precedes the review online, advising readers of the issue and providing a link to the Guardian review. Preston’s apology to The Guardian raises more questions than it resolves. The portion quoted online seems to speak more to the issue of unattributed work than his use of AI. It reads: β€œI made a serious mistake in using an AI tool on a draft review I had written, and I failed to identify and remove overlapping language from another review that the AI dropped in.” This implies that if he had removed the β€œoverlapping” language, the issue would have been avoided. As a literary critic and scholar, I believe the deeper question isn’t whether or not critics should do more to hide their use of AIβ€”but the ethics of using it at all. Why AI can’t do criticism The role of the critic isn’t to summarize or repackage art, but to actively participate in a conversation about it. β€œGood criticism thrives in the complexity of its environment,” writes critic Jane Howard, who is also The Conversation’s Arts + Culture editor. β€œEach review sits in conversation with every other review of a piece of art, with every other review the critic has written.” In other words, the critic is in conversation with both the artist and the audience. The critic’s emotional and intellectual engagement with artβ€”and their translation and co

πŸ’¬ 0 Crumbs ⭐ 0 saves

πŸ’¬ 0 Crumbs

Sign in and join the Nook to post a Crumb.

No Crumbs yet. Be the first!